I have tried using forMember (), AfterMap () and ForPath () but they don’t seem to.
To achieve this we need to use the AutoMapper Conditional Mapping. Exit Exit Automapper II Registration Dialog The mapping is done using rules set up on lines 4-7.
As such it is very useful in cases where you want to have full control over ... If you check out the signature of the MapFrom method, you'll notice that one of the overloads takes a parameter of type Expression>. This is a known behavior of interface constrained generic methods. Persist methods to handle Insert/Update/Delete DTOs to the Entities. the read mapping will fill them in but the Reverse mapping will not copy those properties to the database class. AutoMapper creates a new instance of the relation when mapping from the DTO to the Entity, and that doesn't please the EF. User1400794712 posted Hi mark-1961, According to the second.If you don’t like this approach, you can combine AutoMapper’s approach with custom value resolvers if needed. Condition (src => src != null)) But my test (xunit) fails: Added distinction for Boom-format maps because it matters in working out some of the new color condition things. the Source object is null, the following mapping will, of course, fail with a null reference exception: Mapper. They can perform the mapping of course, but that would require setting up quite sophisticated mapping rules.